STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN RECEIVING ANTI-THYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AND MORBIDITY & MORTALITY IN HAEMATOPOIETIC TRANSPLANTED PATIENTS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

2 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Since the first successful bone marrow transplant in 1959, thousands of patients with lethal diseases such as severe leukemia, a plastic anemia, and inherited immune deficiencies have been successfully treated with hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). But for all the success stories, transplant physicians seeking to make HSC safer and more widely available continue to grapple with the problems of a limited donor pool, graft rejection, and graft vs.-host disease (GVHD). Bone marrow for many years was virtually the only source of HSC-self-renewing, unspecialized cells that give rise to all of the hematologic and immunologic cells-but transplant physicians increasingly are making use of stem cells collected from peripheral blood or the umbilical cord.
Objective: The aim of this work is to study the effect of receiving ATG in allo-HSCT (Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation) on morbidity as GVHD; type of infections; frequency& mortality and survival rate
Patients and Methods: This was an observational cohort retrospective & prospective study, done on 200 patients collected from bone marrow transplantation units at Ain-Shams University& International Medical Center, Cairo-Egypt from August, 2019August, 2021. All participants underwent to clinical examination, laboratory findings, flowcytometry & cytogenetic analysis and all required investigations after explanation of the procedure to the patients and getting a formal consent. This study was approved by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine, Cairo, Al-Azhar University.
Results: there was a statistical difference (P- value <0.05) in the incidence and severity of GVHD between the two studied groups which was lower in the ATG arm than non ATG. Also, ATG was associated with a higher rate of infection which was also statistically significant (P-value <0.05) between the studied gropes. As regard survival rates ATG was associated with a higher survival rate which was statistically significant (P-value <0.05).
Conclusion: ATG was associated with a lower incidence rate and severity of GVHD whether acute or chronic but, on the contrary was associated with increased risk of infections.

Keywords


STUDY OF THE RELATION BETWEEN RECEIVING ANTI-THYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AND MORBIDITY & MORTALITY IN HAEMATOPOIETIC TRANSPLANTED PATIENTS

By

Mohammed Salah Hamed1, Mahmoud Mousa Bazeed1, Maha Tawfiq Elzimaity2

Department of Internal Medicine1, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Department of Internal Medicine2, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Corresponding author: Mohammed Salah Hamed

Mobile: (+20) 1096787269, E-mail: drmohammedimam85@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: Since the first successful bone marrow transplant in 1959, thousands of patients with lethal diseases such as severe leukemia, a plastic anemia, and inherited immune deficiencies have been successfully treated with hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). But for all the success stories, transplant physicians seeking to make HSC safer and more widely available continue to grapple with the problems of a limited donor pool, graft rejection, and graft vs.-host disease (GVHD). Bone marrow for many years was virtually the only source of HSC-self-renewing, unspecialized cells that give rise to all of the hematologic and immunologic cells-but transplant physicians increasingly are making use of stem cells collected from peripheral blood or the umbilical cord.

Objective: The aim of this work is to study the effect of receiving ATG in allo-HSCT (Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation) on morbidity as GVHD; type of infections; frequency& mortality and survival rate

Patients and Methods: This was an observational cohort retrospective & prospective study, done on 200 patients collected from bone marrow transplantation units at Ain-Shams University& International Medical Center, Cairo-Egypt from August, 2019August, 2021. All participants underwent to clinical examination, laboratory findings, flowcytometry & cytogenetic analysis and all required investigations after explanation of the procedure to the patients and getting a formal consent. This study was approved by the ethical committee of faculty of medicine, Cairo, Al-Azhar University.

Results: there was a statistical difference (P- value <0.05) in the incidence and severity of GVHD between the two studied groups which was lower in the ATG arm than non ATG. Also, ATG was associated with a higher rate of infection which was also statistically significant (P-value <0.05) between the studied gropes. As regard survival rates ATG was associated with a higher survival rate which was statistically significant (P-value <0.05).

Conclusion: ATG was associated with a lower incidence rate and severity of GVHD whether acute or chronic but, on the contrary was associated with increased risk of infections.

Key Words: HSCT, ATG& GVHD.

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

     Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) cures a wide range of hematological disorders. Allo-HCT with a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen remains the treatment of choice for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Scott et al., 2017).

     Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is one of the most important factors limiting the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (Wingardet al., 2011) because it negatively affects both the duration and quality of life of patients after transplant (Pidalaet al., 2011).

     The most widely used strategy for GVHD prevention, at least in Europe (Ruutu et al., 2012), is the addition of rabbit antilymphocyte globulin to the standard prophylaxis with a calcineurin inhibitor and either methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. There are several formulations of polyclonal antilymphocyte sera available in different countries, generated in animals (rabbits, horses, and pigs) by inoculation of human thymocytes or human cell line. Available rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte sera are the antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge MA), derived from rabbit vaccination with human thymocytes, and the anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) (Neovii, Rapperswil, Switzerland, formerly ATG Fresenius®), derived from the human Jurkat T-cell line. Horse ATG (hATG, ATGAM®, Pfizer Inc NY, US) is used as first-line therapy of moderate–severe aplastic anemia (Scheinberg et al., 2001) as well as GvHD prophylaxis (Kekre et al., 2017). Finally, porcine ATG is also used for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia especially in China and India (chenM et al., 2016) and, less frequently, in the setting of HSCT (Chen X et al., 2016). Here we restrict the consensus to rabbit sera because of their prevalent use as drugs for GvHD prevention.

     Data regarding the use of rabbit polyclonal serum in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT indicate that both ATG and ATLG significantly reduce the incidence of GvHD but their administration is associated with delayed immune reconstitution (Servais et al., 2015). As a consequence, they lead potentially to an increased risk of infections and of leukemia relapse. Despite the most recent meta-analysis did not show any significant benefit of ATG/ATLG on post-transplant survival (Kumar et al., 2018) data from different studies are still discordant because of different formulations, doses, and timing used as well as the heterogeneity of the studied populations, the hematopoietic stem cell sources, and the intensity of the conditioning regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

     This is an observational cohort prospective & retrospective study, done on two hundred allogeneic transplanted patients admitted in bone marrow transplantation units at Ain-Shams University Hospital (Al-Demerdash) & International Medical Center (IMC), Cairo, Egypt during the period from August, 2019 to August, 2021.

     All data of patients admitted in both units collected and analyzed, starting from history taking, physical examination, required investigations, before transplantation. Also type of remission, conditioning program and post-transplant follow up was done after explaining all steps to the patients and getting informed consent according to ethical committee.

Patients were divided into two groups:

Group (A): Patients received ATG.

Group (B): Patients did not receive ATG.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previous history of CMV or previous allo-haemopoietic stem cell transplantation and/ or received ATG before.

Statistical analyses: Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 24. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative data were expressed as frequency and percentage.

The following tests were done:

     Independent-samples t-test of significance was used when comparing between two means.

     Mann Whitney U test was used when comparing between two means (for abnormal distributed data).

     Chi-square test was used when comparing between non-parametric data.

     A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used on comparing between more than two means.

     Post Hoc test was used for multiple comparisons between different variables.

 

RESULTS

 

 

     Regarding description of demographic data, the study was done on two hundred patients divided in two groups classified according to receiving ATG or not, all patients in the ATG arm was below 16 years old while, patients in the no ATG arm was above 16 years old (Table 1).

     As regard to cytogenetics of the underlying disease, high risk cytogenetics were higher in the non ATG group compared to the ATG group which was secondary to the high variations in age in that group as represented in table 2 while, patients with not available cytogenetics were higher in the ATG group because most of those patient's data was collected from their files (Table 2).

 

 

Table (1):  Comparison between studied groups as regard age and sex

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

Age

2–16 years

100

100%

39

39%

25 - 35 years

0

0%

38

38%

35 - 45 years

0

0%

18

18%

45 - 55 years

0

0%

4

4%

55 - 65 years

0

0%

1

1%

Sex

Male

47

47%

60

60%

Female

53

53%

40

40%

 

 

 

 

 

Table (2):  Comparison between studied groups as regard cytogenetics

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

X2

P-value

Cytogenetics

Not available

83

83%

3

3%

133.7

< 0.001 HS

Low risk

0

0%

25

25%

Intermediate risk

8

8%

27

27%

High risk

9

9%

45

45%

X2: Chi-square test.           HS: p-value < 0.001 is considered highly significant.

NS: p-value > 0.05 is considered non-significant.

 

 

     Results as regard incidence and severity of acute GVHD showed statistical difference between the two studied groups which was lower in the ATG group than non ATG (p-value 0.014 & 0.0141) respectively (Table 3). Also, for comparison between the studied groups as regard incidence & severity of chronic GVHD, there was statistical difference between them, that was lower in the ATG group compared to non ATG (P-value 0.001& 0.041) respectively (Table 4).

 

 

Table (3):  Comparison between studied groups as regard Acute GVHD

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

X2

P-value

Acute GVHD

Negative

77

77%

61

61%

5.9

0.014 S

Positive

23

23%

39

39%

Acute GVHD grade

Grade I

9

39.1%

9

23.1%

8.2

0.041 S

Grade II

6

26.1%

6

15.4%

Grade III

7

30.4%

10

25.6%

Grade IV

1

4.3%

14

35.9%

X2: Chi-square test, S: p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.

 

Table (4):  Comparison between studied groups as regard chronic GVHD

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

X2

P-value

Chronic GVHD

Negative

65

65%

29

29%

26.01

<0.001HS

Positive

35

35%

71

71%

Chronic GVHD grade

Grade I

7

20%

20

28.2%

8.2

0.041 S

Grade II

19

54.3%

18

25.4%

Grade III

5

14.3%

18

25.4%

Grade IV

4

11.4%

15

21.1%

X2: Chi-square test, S: p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table (5):  Comparison between studied groups as regard infections post-transplant

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

X2

P-value

Bacterial

Negative

40

40%

56

56%

5.12

0.023 S

Positive

60

60%

44

44%

Viral

Negative

18

18%

31

31%

4.56

0.032 S

Positive

82

82%

69

69%

Fungal

Negative

78

78%

80

80%

5.7

0.016 S

Positive

29

29%

15

15%

X2: Chi-square test, S: p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.

 

 

     When the impact of ATG on rate & type of infection was compared, there was a higher incidence of infection bacterial, viral or fungal with statistically significant difference which was higher in ATG group than non ATG group (p-value 0.023, 0.032, 0.016) respectively (Table 5). In spite of that viral infection has the higher burden but, when doing univariate analysis there was no statistical difference (P-value 0.109) (Table 6).

 

 

Table (6):  Comparison between studied groups as regard type of post- transplant viral infection

 

ATG

(N = 82)

Non ATG

(N = 69)

X2

P-value

Viral

CMV

25

30.5%

16

23.2%

6.04

0.109 NS

EBV

28

34.1%

15

21.7%

HZV

17

20.7%

22

31.9%

HSV

12

14.6%

16

23.2%

X2: Chi-square test, NS: p-value > 0.05 is considered non-significant.

 

 

     When we compared between the two groups for overall survival (OS) & disease-free survival (DFS) there was better survival rates for ATG group with statistical difference (P-value 0.029 & 0.019) respectively. Also, there was a lower incidence of relapse in ATG group with a statistical difference (P-value 0.044) as shown in Table 7.

 

 

Table (7):  Comparison between studied groups as regard overall survival till the end of the study

 

ATG

(N = 100)

Non ATG

(N = 100)

Test

P-value

Overall survival by months

Median

22.5

8

MW = 3933.5

0.029 S

IQR

6 – 61

2.5 – 62

relapse free survival by months

Median

22

6

MW = 4041.5

0.019 S

IQR

6 – 57

2.12 – 60

Relapse

Negative

90

90%

97

97%

X2 = 4.03

0.044 S

Positive

10

10%

3

3%

X2: Chi-square test, S: p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.

MW: Mann Whitney U test.

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

     The impact of ATG use following allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been poorly explored in Egypt especially in adults in spite of, its good role in reducing the incidence of GVHD which is a major obstacle following HSCT as mentioned before then, we conducted this study as a beginning for clarifying the outcome of using ATG in conditioning regimens in our country, Egypt.

     Our results came in agreement with Arnon et al., 2019 who found a low incidence rate of aGVHD & cGVHD in the ATG group than in non ATG group also, the result came in agreement with Finke et al., 2009 study who found the same results between the studied groups.

     When studying the rate of total infection, it was higher in the ATG group than non ATG group that came in agreement with Lee et al., 2014, a non-randomized comparison between 60 mg/kg vs.30 mg/kg of ATLG, in patients with hematological malignancies receiving a MAC regimen, showed that higher doses were associated with an inferior outcome because of greater fatal infections, while aGvHD, cGvHD, and relapse were similar in the two groups. Although, most of our patients were receiving ATG not ATLG as in the above-mentioned study, but this can be considered a supporting point confirming that ATG serum broadly has a benefit for GVHD reduction but, might increase infection when used in high doses.

     Also, for the higher incidence of infection with ATG use, our results came in agreement with Romberger et al., 2014 that found a trend toward increased infectious mortality with 10mg/kg compared with 4-8mg/kg.

     When comparing the type of infection between the two groups viral infection has the upper hand as about 80% of patients got viral infection either a new infection or reactivation especially for CMV& EBV which came in agreement with Hoegh et al., 2013 also, with Romberger et al., 2014 study who found there was a trend toward increased percentage of patients with > 1 viral infection among patient treated with 10 versus 4 to 8 mg/kg ATG.

     Our results came in disagreement with Soiffer RJ., 2017, they found in a recent prospective double-blind phase 3 study of ATG vs placebo in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia who underwent allo-HCT from a matched unrelated donor (aMUD) following myelo-ablative conditioning (MAC) regimens inferior PFS and OS in the ATG arm, especially in the TBI cohort which may be explained by the difference in samples which was higher in number and more homogenous than our sample, which conducted on almost two different age and disease groups. However, several other open label randomized trials Finke et al., 2017 & Kroger et al., 2016 have reported a benefit of ATG with a lower incidence of cGVHD without negatively impacting PFS or OS as came in our study.

CONCLUSION

     In summary, incorporation of ATG-based in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) in conditioning regimens for allo-HCT resulted in lower GVHD rates and improved non relapse mortality (NRM), without increasing the disease relapse rate. Although this is a registry-based observational study, it is the first analysis of its kind and it demands a prospective validation of the role of ATG in allo-HCT conditioning. Future studies still needed to highlight the dose & timing of ATG administration for better outcome.

REFERENCES

  1. Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, et al. (2011): Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol.; 29:2230–9.
  2. Pidala J, Kurland B, Chai X, Majhail N, Weisdorf DJ, Pavletic S, et al. (2011): Patient-reported quality of life is associated with severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease as measured by NIH criteria: report on baseline data from the chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood. 117:4851–7.
  3. Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Weinstein B, Scheinberg P, Biancotto A, Wu CO, et al. (2011): Horse versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in acquired aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med.; 365:430–8.
  4. Ruutu T, van Biezen A, Hertenstein B, Henseler A, Garderet L, Passweg J, et al. (2012): Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD after allogeneic haematopoietic SCT: a survey of centre strategies by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant.; 47:1459–64.
  5. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, Louis CU, Ahmed N, Jensen M, et al. (2014): Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood.; 124:188–95.
  6. Remberger M, Svahn BM, Mattsson J, Ringden O (2004): Dose study of thymoglobulin during conditioning for unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation.78:122-127.
  7. Servais S, Menten-Dedoyart C, Beguin Y, Seidel L, Gothot A, Daulne C, et al. (2015): Impact of pre-transplant anti-T cell globulin (ATG) on immune recovery after myeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. PLoS ONE; 10: e0130026.
  8. Chen M, Liu C, Zhuang j, Zou N, Xu Y, Zhang W, et al. (2016): Longterm follow-up study of porine anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin therapy combined with cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia. Eur J Hematol.; 96:291–6.
  9. Kroger N, Solano C, Wolschke C, et al. (2016): Antilymphocyte globulin for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease. ¨ N Engl J Med.;374(1):43-53.
  10. Finke J, Schmoor C, Bethge WA, et al. (2017): Long-term outcomes after standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in haemopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: final results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 4(6): e293-e301.
  11. Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Logan BR, et al. (2017): Myeloablative versus reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol.;35(11):1154-1161.
  12. Kekre N, Zhang Y, Zhang MJ, Carreras J, Ahmed P, Anderlini P, et al. (2017): Effect of antithymocyte globulin source on outcomes of bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia. Haematologica.; 102:1291–8.
  13. Soiffer RJ, Kim HT, McGuirk J, et al. (2017): Prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin to assess impact on chronic graft-versus-host disease-free survival in patients undergoing HLA-matched unrelated myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol.;35 (36):4003-4011.
  14. Chen X, Wei J, Huang Y, He Y, Yang D, Zhang R, et al. (2018): Effect of antithymocyte globulin source on outcomes of HLA-matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with severe aplastic anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.; 24:86–90.
  15. Kumar A, Reljic T, Hamadani M, Mohty M, Kharfan-Dabaja MA. (2018): Antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0393-0.
  16. Arnon N and Myriam L et al., (2019): Impact of anti-thymocyte globulin on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with TBI, DOI10.  1182/blood advances. 2019000030.



دراسة العلاقة بين العلاج بمضاد الجلوبولين التيموسي و معدل المضاعفات والوفاة عند مرضي زرع النخاع

محمد صلاح حامد1، محمود موسي بازيد1، مها توفيق الزميتي2

1قسم الأمراض الباطنة، كليةالطب، جامعةالأزهر

2قسم الأمراض الباطنة، كليةالطب، جامعةعين شمس

خلفية البحث: تهدف عملية زرع النخاع في المقام الأول في الحصول علي المنفعة من زرع خلايا جزعية صحية في جسد المريض بدلا من الخلايا الغير صحية -بعد التخلص منها من خلال جرعات من الأدوية اللكيماوية التي تعطي للمريض خلال برنامج التحضير لعملية زرع النخاع العظمي- دون تغلب هذه الخلايا المنزرعة علي جسد المريض وحدوث مايسمي ب داء مهاجمة الخلايا المزروعة لجسد المريض.

         يعمل مضاد الجلوبولين المناعي علي تقليل أو التخلص من الخلايا التائية المناعية للعائل وكذلك من الخلايا المزروعة مما يقلل من حدوث داء مهاجمة الخلايا لجسد المريض، لكن قد يزيد من حدوث تغلب للميكروبات الضارة في جسم المريض مما يؤدي لحدوث الأمراض، لذا يجب موازنة المنفعة والمضرة قبل اعطائه وكذلك حساب الجرعات المناسبة طبقا للأبحاث العلمية والتوصيات الطبية.

الهدف من البحث: دراسة العلاقة بين اعطاء مضاد الجلوبولين المناعي ومعدل الاصابة والوفاة عند المرضي ونسبة حدوث داء مهاجمة الخلايا لجسد المريض.

المرضى وطرق البحث: هذه دراسة جماعية أجريت على مائتي حالة من مرضي زرع النخاع من متبرع، تم علاجهم بوحدتي زرع النخاع  بجامعة عين شمس والمركز الطبي العالمي، خلال الفترة من أغسطس، 2019 إلى أغسطس 2021. وسجلت من المرضى نتائج الفحص السريري، والنتائج المخبرية، والاختبارات الجينية، والقياس بجهاز فلوسيتوميتر, وتم متابعة المرضي بعد الزرع للوقوف علي نسب حدوث ارتداد المرض، مهاجمة الخلايا المزروعة لجسد المريض، معدل الأصابة بالبكتريا أو الفيروسات، ومعدل الوفيات والحياة بدون ارتداد المرض.

نتائج البحث: كان هناك فارق كبير ذو دلالة إحصائية بين المجموعات المدروسة فيما يتعلق بنسبة معدل العدوي البكتيرية والفيروسية والذي كان معدل حدوثه أعلي في المجموعة التي أعطيت مضاد الجلوبولين المناعي. وقد وجد فارق كبير كبير ذو دلالة إحصائية بين المجموعات التي خضعت للدراسة فيما يتعلق بداء مهاجمة الخلايا لجسد المريض والتي كان نسبة حدوثها أقل في المجموعة التي أعطيت مضاد الجلوبولين التيموسي. ووجد أيضاً فارق كبير ذو دلالة إحصائية بين المجموعات المدروسة فيما يتعلق بارتداد المرض. وقد وجد فارق كبيرإحصائياً بين المجموعات المدروسة فيما يتعلق بمعدل انزراع أو فشل الخلايا.

الاستنتاج: يقلل مضاد الجلوبولين المناعي من نسب وكذلك حدة حدوث داء مهاجمة الخلايا لجسد المريض، ولكن قد يزيد من معدل الاصابة بالعدوي البكتيرية والفيروسية والفطرية.

الكلمات الدالة: زرع خلايا النخاع الجذعية، مضاد الجلوبولين المناعي، داء مهاجمة الخلايا لجسد المريض.

  1. REFERENCES

    1. Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, et al. (2011): Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol.; 29:2230–9.
    2. Pidala J, Kurland B, Chai X, Majhail N, Weisdorf DJ, Pavletic S, et al. (2011): Patient-reported quality of life is associated with severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease as measured by NIH criteria: report on baseline data from the chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood. 117:4851–7.
    3. Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Weinstein B, Scheinberg P, Biancotto A, Wu CO, et al. (2011): Horse versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in acquired aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med.; 365:430–8.
    4. Ruutu T, van Biezen A, Hertenstein B, Henseler A, Garderet L, Passweg J, et al. (2012): Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD after allogeneic haematopoietic SCT: a survey of centre strategies by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant.; 47:1459–64.
    5. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, Louis CU, Ahmed N, Jensen M, et al. (2014): Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood.; 124:188–95.
    6. Remberger M, Svahn BM, Mattsson J, Ringden O (2004): Dose study of thymoglobulin during conditioning for unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation.78:122-127.
    7. Servais S, Menten-Dedoyart C, Beguin Y, Seidel L, Gothot A, Daulne C, et al. (2015): Impact of pre-transplant anti-T cell globulin (ATG) on immune recovery after myeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. PLoS ONE; 10: e0130026.
    8. Chen M, Liu C, Zhuang j, Zou N, Xu Y, Zhang W, et al. (2016): Longterm follow-up study of porine anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin therapy combined with cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia. Eur J Hematol.; 96:291–6.
    9. Kroger N, Solano C, Wolschke C, et al. (2016): Antilymphocyte globulin for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease. ¨ N Engl J Med.;374(1):43-53.
    10. Finke J, Schmoor C, Bethge WA, et al. (2017): Long-term outcomes after standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in haemopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: final results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 4(6): e293-e301.
    11. Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Logan BR, et al. (2017): Myeloablative versus reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol.;35(11):1154-1161.
    12. Kekre N, Zhang Y, Zhang MJ, Carreras J, Ahmed P, Anderlini P, et al. (2017): Effect of antithymocyte globulin source on outcomes of bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia. Haematologica.; 102:1291–8.
    13. Soiffer RJ, Kim HT, McGuirk J, et al. (2017): Prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin to assess impact on chronic graft-versus-host disease-free survival in patients undergoing HLA-matched unrelated myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol.;35 (36):4003-4011.
    14. Chen X, Wei J, Huang Y, He Y, Yang D, Zhang R, et al. (2018): Effect of antithymocyte globulin source on outcomes of HLA-matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with severe aplastic anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.; 24:86–90.
    15. Kumar A, Reljic T, Hamadani M, Mohty M, Kharfan-Dabaja MA. (2018): Antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0393-0.
    16. Arnon N and Myriam L et al., (2019): Impact of anti-thymocyte globulin on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with TBI, DOI10.  1182/blood advances. 2019000030.