EFFECT OF VITAMIN D AND/OR ATORVASTATIN ON HIGH FAT DIET INDUCED HYPERLIPIDEMIC ADULTMALE ALBINO RATS

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Atorvastatin has been used as anti-hyperlipidemic agent in the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic related vascular complications with adverse effects on liver and muscles. The classical functions of vitamin D are to regulate calcium-phosphorus homeostasis, andcontrol bone metabolism. In addition, evidence has been accumulated on the pleiotropic effects of vitamin D other than on bone health.
Objective: To study the effect of treatment with vitamin D and/or atorvastatin on high fat diet induced hyperlipidemic adult male albino rats.
Materials and methods: Forty-eight adult male albino rats of a local strain were used as an animal model for this study. They were divided into 8 equal groups; group 1 (control), group 2 (treated with vitamin D), group 3 (treated with atorvastatin), group 4 (treated with vitamin D and atorvastatin), group 5 (hyperlipidemic), group 6 (hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D), group 7 (hyperlipidemic treated with atorvastatin), and group 8 (hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D and atorvastatin).After 4 weeks, body weight was measured and then blood samples were collected and serum was separated for the measurement of fasting blood sugar (FBS), cholesterol, LDL, HDL, TAGs, ALT, AST and CPK.
Results: There was a significant improvement of FBS in hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group when compared to the hyperlipidemic non treated group. ALT and AST levels showed significant improvement in hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group when compared to the hyperlipidemic group. When compared to atorvastatin-treated group, vitamin D and atorvastatin treated groups showed significant improvement in ALT, AST and CPK levels.
Conclusion: Vitamin D shared in controlling blood sugar, and it has a protective effect against hyperlipidemia induced liver injury and against atorvastatin induced liver and muscle injury

Keywords

Main Subjects


EFFECT OF VITAMIN D AND/OR ATORVASTATIN ON HIGH FAT DIET INDUCED HYPERLIPIDEMIC ADULTMALE ALBINO RATS

By

Ahmad Mohammad Farag Al-Kot

Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-AzharUniversity, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Ahmad Mohammad Farag Alkot

E-mail: dr.ahmadalkot@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: Atorvastatin has been used as anti-hyperlipidemic agent in the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic related vascular complications with adverse effects on liver and muscles. The classical functions of vitamin D are to regulate calcium-phosphorus homeostasis, andcontrol bone metabolism. In addition, evidence has been accumulated on the pleiotropic effects of vitamin D other than on bone health.

Objective: To study the effect of treatment with vitamin D and/or atorvastatin on high fat diet induced hyperlipidemic adult male albino rats.

Materials and methods: Forty-eight adult male albino rats of a local strain were used as an animal model for this study. They were divided into 8 equal groups; group 1 (control), group 2 (treated with vitamin D), group 3 (treated with atorvastatin), group 4 (treated with vitamin D and atorvastatin), group 5 (hyperlipidemic), group 6 (hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D), group 7 (hyperlipidemic treated with atorvastatin), and group 8 (hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D and atorvastatin).After 4 weeks, body weight was measured and then blood samples were collected and serum was separated for the measurement of fasting blood sugar (FBS), cholesterol, LDL, HDL, TAGs, ALT, AST and CPK.

Results: There was a significant improvement of FBS in hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group when compared to the hyperlipidemic non treated group. ALT and AST levels showed significant improvement in hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group when compared to the hyperlipidemic group. When compared to atorvastatin-treated group, vitamin D and atorvastatin treated groups showed significant improvement in ALT, AST and CPK levels.

Conclusion: Vitamin D shared in controlling blood sugar, and it has a protective effect against hyperlipidemia induced liver injury and against atorvastatin induced liver and muscle injury

Key words: Vitamin D, Atorvastatin, hyperlipidemia.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

     People with hyperlipidemia are at greatly higher risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disorders as compared to those with normal lipid profile. Therefore, early detection and treatment of hyperlipidemia are imperative to reduce cardiovascular events and premature death. Statins are the mainstay treatment for hyperlipidemia. However, the limitations of statins include treatment resistance, intolerance due to adverse events, and a lack of adherence which contribute to poor outcomes. As such, many patients require adjunct therapies to properly control hyperlipidemia (Karr, 2017).

     Vitamin D is a group of fat-soluble secosteroids (steroids with a broken steroid ring). The most important compounds in this group are vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). The major natural source of the vitamin is synthesis of cholecalciferol in the lower layers of skin epidermis through a chemical reaction that is dependent on sun exposure (specifically to UVradiation) (Borel et al., 2015).

     The classical functions of vitamin D are to regulate calcium-phosphorus homeostasis andcontrol bone metabolism. However, the discovery of vitamin D receptors (VDR), and confirming their presence in various tissues has opened the mechanistic link between vitamin D, and the occurrence of many diseases and disorders such asobesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome,type II diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk, Alzheimer’s disease, depression and cancer. Over the past 2 decades, interest in vitamin D has increased significantly. Requests for serum vitamin D concentration measurements increased by many folds and the number of vitamin D supplements sales has raised several times (Dzik and Kaczor, 2019).

     Besides role of vitamin D in the maintenance of bone tissue, as well as in the maintenance of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, some authors have shown its relationship to different pathologies. They suggest that it is also involved in many processes such as secretion of hormones such as insulin, regulation of body weight, and role in the immune system. Some studies have shown that vitamin D acts as a potent modifier of the risk of developing cardiovascular complications (Barbalho et al., 2018).

     The present work aimed at studying the effect of treatment with vitamin D and/or atorvastatin on high fat diet induced hyperlipidemic adult male albino rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

     Forty-eight adult male albino rats of a local strain were used as an animal model for this study. Their ages were 8 weeks, and their weight 110 – 140 g. They were kept in suitable cages (20x32x20 cm for every 3 rats)at room temperature with the natural light-dark cycle. They were kept for 10 days for the adaptation to the new environments before starting the experiment. The animals were divided into eight equal groups:

•   Group 1 (control) was maintained on a standard diet of a commercial rat chow and tap water.

•   Group 2 was maintained on a standard diet of a commercial rat chow and tap water and treated with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol from medical union pharmaceuticals company - Egypt) orally at a dose of 500 IU/kg daily (Elbassuoni et al., 2018).

•   Group 3 was maintained on a standard diet of a commercial rat chow and tap water and treated with atorvastatin (from medical union pharmaceuticals company - Egypt) orally at a dose of 25 mg/kg daily (Khan et al., 2018).

•   Group 4 was maintained on a standard diet of a commercial rat chow and tap water and treated with both vitamin D and atorvastatin.

•   Group 5 (hyperlipidemic) had free access to high fat diet (HFD) (Vanaspati ghee and coconut oil in a ratio of 3:2 respectively) in addition to normal diet for 4 weeks (Mehanna et al, 2020).

•   Group 6 was hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D.

•   Group 7 was hyperlipidemic treated with atorvastatin.

•   Group 8 was hyperlipidemic treated with vitamin D and atorvastatin.

     After 4 weeks from the onset of the experiment, body weight was determined; andblood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus by using a heparinized capillary tube (about 0.75 – 1.0 mm internal diameter) from the medial canthus, after whole night fast. The collected blood samples were kept in graduated plastic centrifuge tubes containing EDTA. The blood was centrifuged at 5000 rotations per minute for about 15 minutes to separate the serum. Serum was sucked out into Eppendorf tubes, and stored frozen at -20oC till used for the measurement of:

•   Fasting blood sugar (FBS) (mg/dl).

•   Triacylglycerols (TAGs) (mg/dl).

•   Total cholesterol (mg/dl).

•   High density lipoproteins (HDL) (mg/dl).

•   Low density lipoproteins (LDL) (mg/dl).

•   Alanine transaminase (ALT) (U/L).

•   Aspartate transaminase (AST) (U/L).

•   Creatin phosphokinase (CPK) (U/L).

Statistical analysis: Collected Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.One-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc “Tukey” test were used to compare means. Data were expressed as means ± SD and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESULTS

 

 

     Concerning body weight, it was135.6 ± 9.6 grams in group 1, 137.6 ± 9.1 grams in group 2, 135 ± 7.2 in group 3, 136.4 ± 6.5 grams in group 4, 161 ± 11.3 grams in group 5, 150.8 ± 7.4 grams in group 6, 157.4 ± 6.6 grams in group 7 and 151.2 ± 5 grams in group 8. As regard FBS levels, they were 77.7 ± 5.1, 82 ± 5.9, 80.1 ± 9.9, 81.3 ± 5.5, 113.4 ± 10.1, 83.5 ± 4.5, 114.2 ± 15.2 and 84.7 ± 6.5 mg/dl in order from group 1 to group 8. Comparisons between different groups are detected in Table 1 and Table 2.


 

Table (1):   Comparing different groups as regard body weight

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group1

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group2

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group5

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

 

Table (2):   Comparing different groups as regard FBS

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 2

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P > 0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     The hyperlipidemic group 5 and the hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated group 7 showed a statistically significant elevation (P ≤ 0.05) in body weight and FBS when compared with the control group 1. The hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group 6 and the hyperlipidemic vitamin D- and atorvastatin-treated group 8 showed a reduction in body weight and FBS when compared with the hyperlipidemic group 5. The reduction in FBS was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). However, the difference was not significant concerning the reduction in body weight (Figure 1).

 

 


Figure (1):  Body weight and FBS in different groups of the study

a = significant difference when comparing with group 1

b = significant difference when comparing with group 5

 

 

     Concerning cholesterol level, it was 98.1 ± 4.1 mg/dl in group 1, 98.7 ± 7.4 mg/dl in group 2, 82.3 ± 5.9 mg/dl in group 3, 81.3 ± 5.5 mg/dl in group 4, 135.5 ± 4.8 mg/dl in group 5, 125.5 ± 5.8mg/dl in group 6, 97.1 ± 10.5mg/dl in group 7 and 85.5 ± 6.1mg/dl in group 8. As regard TAGs levels, theywere81.7 ± 5.6, 79.3 ± 5.6, 74.04 ± 2.3, 75.9 ± 2.8, 129.9 ± 4.8, 120.7 ± 5.8, 83 ± 5.7 and 86.6 ± 3.4 mg/dl in order from group 1 to group 8. LDL levels were 51.8 ± 1.8, 49.4 ± 7.14, 29.7 ± 5.4, 29.4 ± 5.7, 82.6 ± 6.4, 68.7 ± 8.3, 42.6 ± 10 and 29.6 ± 6.3 mg/dl respectively in the studied groups from group 1 to group 8. Whereas HDL level was 30.02 ± 3.5 mg/dl in group 1, 33.4 ± 2.9 mg/dl in group 2, 37.8 ± 2.2 mg/dl in group 3, 38 ± 2.8 mg/dl in group 4, 27.5 ± 2.7 mg/dl in group 5, 32.8 ± 4.5 mg/dl in group 6, 38 ± 2.8 mg/dl in group 7 and 40.9 ± 2.4 mg/dl in group 8. Comparisons between different groups are detected in tables No 3 to No 6.

 

 

 

 

 

Table (3):   Comparing different groups as regard cholesterol

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 2

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P > 0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P > 0.05

 

Table (4):   Comparing different groups as regard TAGs

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 2

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

 

Table (5):   Comparing different groups as regard LDL

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 2

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P > 0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

 

Table (6):   Comparing different groups as regard HDL

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 2

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 3

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P > 0.05

 

 

     The hyperlipidemic group 5 showed a statistically significant elevation (P ≤ 0.05) in cholesterol, TAGs and LDL when compared with the control group 1. These parameters showed significant reduction in hyperlipidemic atorvastatin-treated group 7, and hyperlipidemic vitamin-D & atorvastatin-treated group 8 when compared with the hyperlipidemic group 5 (P ≤ 0.05). Also, HDL significantly elevated in hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated group 7 and hyperlipidemic vitamin-D & atorvastatin-treated group 8 when compared with the hyperlipidemic group 5 (P ≤ 0.05). There was no significant difference in lipid profile when comparing hyperlipidemic atorvastatin-treated group 7 with hyperlipidemic vitamin D- & atorvastatin-treated group 8 (Figure 2).

 

 

Figure (2):  Lipid profile in different groups of the study

a = significant difference when comparing with group 1

b = significant difference when comparing with group 5

 

     Concerning ALT level, it was39.9 ± 3.1U/L in group 1, 37.9±3.7U/Lin group 2, 53.1± 3.6U/L in group 3, 42.6 ± 4.6U/L in group 4, 51.9 ± 4.6U/L in group 5, 38.9 ± 3.3U/L in group 6, 57.3 ± 5.1U/L in group 7 and 40.1 ± 3.2U/L in group 8.

     As regard AST level, it was 82.1 ± 5.6 U/L in group 1, 79.2 ± 5.3 U/L in group 2, 116.9 ± 6.5 U/L in group 3, 84.9 ± 4.5 U/L in group 4, 103.1 ± 6.8 U/L in group 5, 88.2 ± 3.7 U/L in group 6, 108.2 ± 7.3 U/L in group 7 and 90.5 ± 4.5 U/L in group 8.

     CPK levels were 152.6 ± 7.3 U/L, 152.4 ± 7.5 U/L, 208.7 ± 14.3 U/L, 159.7 ± 9.3 U/L, 157.2 ± 7.8 U/L, 153.9 ± 8.8 U/L, 214.9 ± 10.7 U/L and 162.2 ± 4.4 U/L respectively in the studied groups from group 1 to group 8. Comparisons between different groups are detected in tables 7 and 8.

 

 

Table (7):   Comparing different groups as regard ALT and AST

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 2

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 3

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

 

Table (8):   Comparing different groups as regard CPK

 

Group 1

Control

Group 2

Vit D treated

Group 3

Atorvastatin treated

Group 4

Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 5

hyperlipidemic

Group 6

Hyperlipidemic Vit D treated

Group 7

Hyperlipidemic atorvastatin treated

Group 8

Hyperlipidemic Vit D & atorvastatin treated

Group 1

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 2

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 3

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

Group 4

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 5

 

 

 

 

 

P>0.05

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

P>0.05

Group 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P≤0.05*

 

 

 

 

 

 

     The hyperlipidemic group 5 showed a significant elevation in ALT and AST when compared to the control group 1. However, the hyperlipidemic vitamin D-treated group 6 showed a significant reduction in ALT and AST levels when compared to the hyperlipidemic non treated group 5.

     The atorvastatin-treated group 3 and the hyperlipidemic atorvastatin-treated group 7 showed significant elevation in ALT, AST and CPK when compared to the control group 1. The vitamin D-& atorvastatin-treated group 4 showed a significant reduction in ALT, AST and CPK levels when compared to the atorvastatin treated group 3. Also, the hyperlipidemic vitamin D-& atorvastatin-treated group 8 showed a significant reduction in ALT, AST and CPK levels when compared to the hyperlipidemic atorvastatin-treated group 7 (Figure 3).

 

 


Figure (3):  ALT, AST and CPK levels in different groups of the study

a = significant difference when comparing with group 1

b = significant difference when comparing with group 3

c = significant difference when comparing with group 5

d = significant difference when comparing with group 7

 

 

DISCUSSION

     In this study, high fat diet (HFD) induced hyperlipidemic rats showed a significantly higher fasting blood glucose level. This finding was in agreement with la Fleur et al. (2011) who reported that rats fed HFD develop obesity and insulin resistance. Zhang et al. (2020-a) reported similar findings, and stated that the elevated concentrations of circulating lipids secondary to HFD induces insulin resistance and makes compensation of the pancreatic β-cell insufficient, resulting in glucose intolerance. These findings were also consistent with He et al. (2012) who stated that several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the causal role of HFD consumption in the development of insulin resistance. In the condition of nutrition over supply, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation metabolism would produce a larger amount ROS. Oxidative stress results in insulin resistance and impairment of glucose disposal. Zhang et al. (2020-b) reported that many inflammatory cytokines are released from adipose tissue and mediates insulin resistance.

     The current study showed that treatment with vitamin D significantly improved fasting blood glucose level in HFD induced hyperlipidemic rats. This was concordant with Cordeiro et al. (2021) who reported that vit D improves insulin sensitivity and inhibits adipogenesis via decreasing nuclear translocation of pro-adipogenic transcription factors and increasing the expression of adipogenic repressors. Also, this result was consistent with Mostafa et al. (2016) who stated that vitamin D supplementation ameliorated some of the abnormalities associated with metabolic syndrome, namely insulin resistance, hyperglycemia and obesity as well as dyslipidemia.

     Vitamin D receptors are prominently expressed in both pancreatic beta-cells that secrete insulin, and in peripheral target tissues that respond to insulin such as skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Animals with vitamin Dreceptor mutations have impaired insulin secretion and poorer glucose tolerance than those with normal vitamin D receptors. Vitamin D can preserve insulin release and insulin-mediated processes in insulin-responsive tissues by modulating the extracellular and intracellular calcium pools (Sergeev, 2016). Sadek and Shaheen (2014) pointed out that vitamin D, by decreasing the number of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improve insulin sensitivity and hence blood glucose level.

     In the present study, HFD induced hyperlipidemic rats showed significant elevation of ALT and AST levels. This was in agreement with Ma et al. (2017), Xia et al, (2019) and Esmail et al, (2021). They concluded that HFD induces steatohepatitis. The affected hepatocytes release large amount of their enzymatic content namely ALT and AST into the plasma.

     In the current study, HFD induced hyperlipidemic rats treated with vitamin D showed a significant improvement in ALT and AST levels compared to the non-treated rats. This was in concordance with Yin et al, (2012) who stated that several mechanisms are involved in the preventing effects of vitamin D on hepatic steatosis. Vitamin D improves insulin sensitivity. Therefore, it enhances anti-lipolytic effect of insulin and suppresses lipid release from adipose tissue and its eventual uptake in the liver. In addition, a direct inhibitory effect of vitamin D on lipolysis has been reported in adipocytes. Similar findings were reported by Zhu et al. (2017) who stated that vitamin D protects against HFD-induced liver injury by attenuating oxidative stress and up-regulating the expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes. Zhang et al. (2021) stated that many mechanisms have been included in the protecting effect of vitamin D against HFD induced liver injury. Beside its antioxidant effect and enhancing insulin sensitivity, vitamin D alsoinhibits p53 pathway which induce apoptosis. Vitamin D, by inducing autophagy, maintains normal cellular homeostasis. Vitamin D also inhibitspyroptosis (a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death).

     The current study showed that groups treated with atorvastatin alone showed significant elevation in ALT, AST and CPK whereas these enzymes were not elevated in groups treated with both atorvastatin and Vitamin D. Statins may adversely affect liver and muscles. The pattern of liver injury varies from mild cholestatic injury to marked hepatocellular injury. Documented statins adverse effects on muscles ranges from asymptomatic elevation of CPK, myalgias, and up to rhabdomyolysis (Stroes et al., 2015). Statin-induced injury is due to impaired mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, induction of apoptosis, and reduction in the expression of chloride channel, in addition to the alteration of Ca2+ homeostasis (Ghalwash et al, 2018). Chogtu et al. (2020) reported that myalgia, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis and hepatotoxicity, are encountered side effects of statins, and vitamin D can prevent statin-induced liver and muscle injury.

     Inadequate vitamin D status may complicate the adverse effect risk of statins. Vitamin D is a potent antioxidant that facilitates balanced mitochondrial activities, preventing oxidative stress-related protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage, thus protecting against statin induced liver and muscle injury (Ahmed et al., 2019).

CONCLUSION

     Vitamin D shared in controlling blood sugar in conditions of hyperlipidemia. Also, vitamin D showed a protective effect against liver injury induced by high fat diet and against liver and muscle injury induced by atorvastatin as indicated by the recovery in liver and muscle enzymes in groups treated by vitamin D compared to the non-treated groups.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmed E. A., Abd-Eldayem A. M. and Abou Hagag N. A. (2019): The possible protective effects of vitamin D and L-carnitine against used atorvastatin-induced myopathy and hepatotoxicity. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 28(6): 1751-1759.
  2. Barbalho S. M., Tofano R. J., de Campos A. L., Rodrigues A. S., Quesada K., Bechara M. D., de Alvares Goulart R. and Oshiiwa M. (2018): Association between vitamin D status and metabolic syndrome risk factors. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 12(4): 501-507.
  3. Borel P., Caillaud D. and Cano N. J. (2015): Vitamin D bioavailability: state of the art. Critical Review in Food Science and Nutrition 55(9): 1193-1205.
  4. Chogtu B., Ommurugan B., Thomson S. R. and Kalthur S. G. (2020): Effect of vitamin D analogue on rosuvastatin-induced myopathy in Wister rats. The Scientific World Journal, 4704825: 1-6.
  5. Cordeiro M. M., Biscaia P. B., Brunoski J., Ribeiro R. A., Franco G. C. N. and Scomparin D. X. (2021): Vitamin D supplementation decreases visceral adiposity and normalizes leptinemia and circulating TNF-α levels in western diet-fed obese rats. Life Sciences, 278 (11950): 1-8.
  6. Dzik K. P. and Kaczor J. J. (2019): Mechanisms of vitamin D on skeletal muscle function: oxidative stress, energy metabolism and anabolic state. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(4): 825-839.
  7. Elbassuoni E. A., Ragy M. M. and S Ahmed S. M. (2018): Evidence of the protective effect of l-arginine and vitamin D against monosodium glutamate-induced liver and kidney dysfunction in rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 108: 799-808.
  8. Esmail M., Anwar S., Kandeil M., El-Zanaty A. M. and Abdel-Gabbar M. (2021): Effect of Nigella sativa, atorvastatin, or L-Carnitine on high fat diet-induced obesity in adult male Albino rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 141 (111818): 1-8.
  9. Ghalwash M., Elmasry A. and El-Adeeb N. (2018): Effect of L-Carnitine on the skeletal muscle contractility in simvastatin-induced myopathy in rats. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 29(5): 483-491.
  10. He H. J., Wang G. Y., Gao Y., Ling W. H., Yu Z. W. and Jin T. R. (2012): Curcumin attenuates Nrf2 signaling defect, oxidative stress in muscle and glucose intolerance in high fat diet-fed mice. World Journal of Diabetes, 3(5): 94-104.
  11. Karr S. (2017): Epidemiology and management of hyperlipidemia. The American Journal of Managed Care, 23(9 Suppl): S139-S148.
  12. Khan T. J., Ahmed Y. M., Zamzami M. A., Mohamed S. A., Khan I., Baothman O. A. S., Mehanna M. G. and Yasir M. (2018): Effect of atorvastatin on the gut microbiota of high fat diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rats. Scientific Reports, 8(662): 1-9.
  13. la Fleur S. E., Luijendijk M. C. M., Van Rozen A. J., Kalsbeek A. and Adan R. A. H. (2011): A free-choice high-fat high-sugar diet induces glucose intolerance and insulin unresponsiveness to a glucose load not explained by obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 35(4): 595-604.
  14. Ma Z., Chu L., Liu H., Wang W., Li J., Yao W., Yi J. and Gao Y. (2017): Beneficial effects of paeoniflorin on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high-fat diet in rats. Scientific Reports, 7(44819): 1-10.
  15. Mehanna M., Abd Allah E. E.-D. E.-S., Alshahed F. A. N. and Al-Azab H. W. (2020): Effect of Simvastatin on the Skeletal Muscles of Senile Male Albino Rats and Possible Protective Role of L-Carnitine. A Histological Study. Egyptian Journal of Histology, 43(1): 286-300.
  16. Mostafa D. K., Nasra R. A., Zahran N. and Ghoneim M. T. (2016): Pleiotropic protective effects of Vitamin D against high fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome in rats: One for all. European Journal of Pharmacology, 792: 38-47.
  17. Sadek K. M. and Shaheen H. (2014): Biochemical efficacy of vitamin D in ameliorating endocrine and metabolic disorders in diabetic rats. Pharmaceutical Biology, 52(5): 591-596.
  18. Sergeev I. N. (2016): 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and type 2 diabetes: Ca2+-dependent molecular mechanisms and the role of vitamin D status. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation, 26(1): 61-65.
  19. Stroes E. S., Thompson P. D., Corsini A., G. Vladutiu G. D., Raal F. J., Ray K. K., Roden M., Stein E., Tokgozoglu L. and Nordestgaard B. G. (2015): Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy—European Atherosclerosis Society consensus panel statement on assessment, etiology and management. European Heart Journal, 36(17): 1012-1022.
  20. Xia H. M., Wang J., Xie X. J., Xu L. J. and Tang S. Q. (2019): Green tea polyphenols attenuate hepatic steatosis, and reduce insulin resistance and inflammation in high-fat diet-induced rats. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 44(4): 1523-1530.
  21. Yin Y., Yu Z., Xia M., Luo X., Lu X. and Ling W. (2012): Vitamin D attenuates high fat diet–induced hepatic steatosis in rats by modulating lipid metabolism. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 42(11): 1189-1196.
  22. Zhang C., Abdulaziz A. A., Kaddour B., Wu Q., Xin L., Li X., Fan G. and Teng C. (2020-a): Xylan-oligosaccharides ameliorate high fat diet induced obesity and glucose intolerance and modulate plasma lipid profile and gut microbiota in mice. Journal of Functional Foods, 64 (103622): 1-8.
  23. Zhang S., Chen Q., Lin X., Chen M. and Liu Q. (2020-b): A review of a drop in as the medium of dialogue between energy regulation and immune regulation. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 3947806: 1-7.
  24. Zhang X., Shang X., Jin S., Ma Z., Wang H., Ao N., Yang J. and Du J. (2021): Vitamin D ameliorates high-fat-diet-induced hepatic injury via inhibiting pyroptosis and alters gut microbiota in rats. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 705 (108894): 1-11.
  25. Zhu C. g., Liu Y. X., Wang H., Wang B. P., Qu H. Q., Wang B. L. and Zhu M. (2017): Active form of vitamin D ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by alleviating oxidative stress in a high-fat diet rat model. Endocrine Journal, 64(7): 663-673.


تأثير فيتامين د مع/أو أتورفاستاتين علي ذكور الجرذان البيضاء البالغة المصابة بإرتفاع دهون الدم المحدث بالغذاء عالي الدهن

أحمد محمد فرج القط

قسم الفسيولوجيا الطبية، كلية الطب، جامعة الأزهر

البريد الالكتروني: dr.ahmadalkot@gmail.com

خلفية البحث: يستخدم الأتورفاستاتين كمخفض لنسب الدهون المرتفعة بالدم في الوقاية الأولية والثانوية من أمراض الأوعية الدموية المرتبطة بتصلب الشرايين لكن مصحوبا بأثار سلبية علي الكبد والعضلات. والوظيفة الأساسية لفيتامين د هي تنظيم إتزان الكالسيوم والفوسفور بالدم والتحكم في الأيض الغذائي في العظام و إضافة لهذه التأثيراتففي العقدين الأخرين تراكمت أدلة علي أن فيتامين د له تأثيرات متنوعة أخري بخلاف تأثيره علي صحة العظام.

الهدف من البحث: دراسة تأثير العلاج بفيتامين د مع أو بدون الأتورفاستاتين علي ذكور الجرذان البيضاء البالغة المصابة بإرتفاع دهون الدم المحدث بالغذاء عالي الدهون.

مواد وطرق البحث: ثمانية وأربعون جرذا أبيضا ذكرا من سلالة محلية تم إستخدامهم كنماذج لهذه الدراسة وتم تقسيمهم الي ثمانية مجموعات متساوية؛ مجموعة 1 (ضابطة)، مجموعة 2 (يتم علاجها بفيتامين د)، مجموعة 3 (يتم علاجها بالأتورفاستاتين)، مجموعة 4 (يتم علاجها بفيتامين د والأتورفاستاتين)، مجموعة 5 (مصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم)، مجموعة 6(مصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و يتم علاجها بفيتامين د)، مجموعة 7 (مصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و يتم علاجها بالأتورفاستاتين)، مجموعة 8 (مصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و يتم علاجها بفيتامين د والأتورفاستاتين). بعد أربعة أسابيع تم قياس وزن الجسم ثم أخذ عينات الدم و فصل مصل الدم لقياس السكر الصائم والكوليستيرول والدهون الثلاثية والبروتين الدهني منخفض الكثافة والبروتين الدهني عالي الكثافة وألانين ترانس أميناز وأسبرتات ترانس أميناز والكرياتين فوسفوكيناز.

نتائج البحث: كان هناك تحسناً ذا دلالة إحصائية في مستوي سكر الدم الصائم في المجموعة المصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم والتي تم علاجها بفيتامين د مقارنة بالمجموعة المصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و تحسنت مستويات ألانين ترانس أميناز وأسبرتات ترانس أميناز تحسناً ذا دلالة إحصائية في المجموعة المصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و التي تم علاجها بفيتامين د مقارنة بالمجموعة المصابة بإرتفاع الدهون في الدم و عندما قورنت بالمجموعات التي تعالج بالأتورفاستاتين أظهرت المجموعات التي تعالج بالأتورفاستاتين وفيتامين د تحسنا ذا دلالة إحصائية في مستويات ألانين ترانس أميناز وأسبرتات ترانس أميناز والكرياتين فوسفوكيناز.

الإستتنتاج: يمكن أن يساعد فيتامين د علي تحسن مستويات السكر بالدم كما أن له تأثيراً وقائياً ضد الإعتلال الذي قد يصيب الكبد من إرتفاع الدهون بالدم والإعتلال الذي قد يصيب الكبد والعضلات بسبب الأتورفاستاتين.

الكلمات الدالة: فيتامين د، أتورفاستاتين، إرتفاع الدهون بالدم.

  1. REFERENCES

    1. Ahmed E. A., Abd-Eldayem A. M. and Abou Hagag N. A. (2019): The possible protective effects of vitamin D and L-carnitine against used atorvastatin-induced myopathy and hepatotoxicity. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 28(6): 1751-1759.
    2. Barbalho S. M., Tofano R. J., de Campos A. L., Rodrigues A. S., Quesada K., Bechara M. D., de Alvares Goulart R. and Oshiiwa M. (2018): Association between vitamin D status and metabolic syndrome risk factors. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 12(4): 501-507.
    3. Borel P., Caillaud D. and Cano N. J. (2015): Vitamin D bioavailability: state of the art. Critical Review in Food Science and Nutrition 55(9): 1193-1205.
    4. Chogtu B., Ommurugan B., Thomson S. R. and Kalthur S. G. (2020): Effect of vitamin D analogue on rosuvastatin-induced myopathy in Wister rats. The Scientific World Journal, 4704825: 1-6.
    5. Cordeiro M. M., Biscaia P. B., Brunoski J., Ribeiro R. A., Franco G. C. N. and Scomparin D. X. (2021): Vitamin D supplementation decreases visceral adiposity and normalizes leptinemia and circulating TNF-α levels in western diet-fed obese rats. Life Sciences, 278 (11950): 1-8.
    6. Dzik K. P. and Kaczor J. J. (2019): Mechanisms of vitamin D on skeletal muscle function: oxidative stress, energy metabolism and anabolic state. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 119(4): 825-839.
    7. Elbassuoni E. A., Ragy M. M. and S Ahmed S. M. (2018): Evidence of the protective effect of l-arginine and vitamin D against monosodium glutamate-induced liver and kidney dysfunction in rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 108: 799-808.
    8. Esmail M., Anwar S., Kandeil M., El-Zanaty A. M. and Abdel-Gabbar M. (2021): Effect of Nigella sativa, atorvastatin, or L-Carnitine on high fat diet-induced obesity in adult male Albino rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 141 (111818): 1-8.
    9. Ghalwash M., Elmasry A. and El-Adeeb N. (2018): Effect of L-Carnitine on the skeletal muscle contractility in simvastatin-induced myopathy in rats. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 29(5): 483-491.
    10. He H. J., Wang G. Y., Gao Y., Ling W. H., Yu Z. W. and Jin T. R. (2012): Curcumin attenuates Nrf2 signaling defect, oxidative stress in muscle and glucose intolerance in high fat diet-fed mice. World Journal of Diabetes, 3(5): 94-104.
    11. Karr S. (2017): Epidemiology and management of hyperlipidemia. The American Journal of Managed Care, 23(9 Suppl): S139-S148.
    12. Khan T. J., Ahmed Y. M., Zamzami M. A., Mohamed S. A., Khan I., Baothman O. A. S., Mehanna M. G. and Yasir M. (2018): Effect of atorvastatin on the gut microbiota of high fat diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rats. Scientific Reports, 8(662): 1-9.
    13. la Fleur S. E., Luijendijk M. C. M., Van Rozen A. J., Kalsbeek A. and Adan R. A. H. (2011): A free-choice high-fat high-sugar diet induces glucose intolerance and insulin unresponsiveness to a glucose load not explained by obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 35(4): 595-604.
    14. Ma Z., Chu L., Liu H., Wang W., Li J., Yao W., Yi J. and Gao Y. (2017): Beneficial effects of paeoniflorin on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high-fat diet in rats. Scientific Reports, 7(44819): 1-10.
    15. Mehanna M., Abd Allah E. E.-D. E.-S., Alshahed F. A. N. and Al-Azab H. W. (2020): Effect of Simvastatin on the Skeletal Muscles of Senile Male Albino Rats and Possible Protective Role of L-Carnitine. A Histological Study. Egyptian Journal of Histology, 43(1): 286-300.
    16. Mostafa D. K., Nasra R. A., Zahran N. and Ghoneim M. T. (2016): Pleiotropic protective effects of Vitamin D against high fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome in rats: One for all. European Journal of Pharmacology, 792: 38-47.
    17. Sadek K. M. and Shaheen H. (2014): Biochemical efficacy of vitamin D in ameliorating endocrine and metabolic disorders in diabetic rats. Pharmaceutical Biology, 52(5): 591-596.
    18. Sergeev I. N. (2016): 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and type 2 diabetes: Ca2+-dependent molecular mechanisms and the role of vitamin D status. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation, 26(1): 61-65.
    19. Stroes E. S., Thompson P. D., Corsini A., G. Vladutiu G. D., Raal F. J., Ray K. K., Roden M., Stein E., Tokgozoglu L. and Nordestgaard B. G. (2015): Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy—European Atherosclerosis Society consensus panel statement on assessment, etiology and management. European Heart Journal, 36(17): 1012-1022.
    20. Xia H. M., Wang J., Xie X. J., Xu L. J. and Tang S. Q. (2019): Green tea polyphenols attenuate hepatic steatosis, and reduce insulin resistance and inflammation in high-fat diet-induced rats. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 44(4): 1523-1530.
    21. Yin Y., Yu Z., Xia M., Luo X., Lu X. and Ling W. (2012): Vitamin D attenuates high fat diet–induced hepatic steatosis in rats by modulating lipid metabolism. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 42(11): 1189-1196.
    22. Zhang C., Abdulaziz A. A., Kaddour B., Wu Q., Xin L., Li X., Fan G. and Teng C. (2020-a): Xylan-oligosaccharides ameliorate high fat diet induced obesity and glucose intolerance and modulate plasma lipid profile and gut microbiota in mice. Journal of Functional Foods, 64 (103622): 1-8.
    23. Zhang S., Chen Q., Lin X., Chen M. and Liu Q. (2020-b): A review of a drop in as the medium of dialogue between energy regulation and immune regulation. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 3947806: 1-7.
    24. Zhang X., Shang X., Jin S., Ma Z., Wang H., Ao N., Yang J. and Du J. (2021): Vitamin D ameliorates high-fat-diet-induced hepatic injury via inhibiting pyroptosis and alters gut microbiota in rats. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 705 (108894): 1-11.
    25. Zhu C. g., Liu Y. X., Wang H., Wang B. P., Qu H. Q., Wang B. L. and Zhu M. (2017): Active form of vitamin D ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by alleviating oxidative stress in a high-fat diet rat model. Endocrine Journal, 64(7): 663-673.